Sign in

Audit Offer

Diagnose what is silently costing the buyer money and deliver a prioritized findings report they can act on immediately.

Pro involved Service Offers

What it adds

From the buyer's existing assets, analytics exports, and past review notes, the builder produces an offer whose entire product is a written evaluation: a scored findings document with severity ranking and recommended fixes. It converts by making the unknown feel measurable and cheap to expose, using a low commitment price and a visible methodology that proves rigor before purchase.

What your builder is told to do

8

The actual instructions, in order.
  1. 1

    Open the supplied audit artifacts and checklists first, and extract the evaluation dimensions, the scoring scale, and the typical number of findings produced. These become the page's structural backbone.

  2. 2

    Publish the methodology as a visible list of the areas reviewed, with one line per area describing what specifically gets checked. Do not summarize it into a vague phrase — the granularity is the persuasion.

  3. 3

    Show the deliverable itself: page count or section count, format, whether it includes a scored summary, and whether a walkthrough call is attached. Include a redacted or structural preview of the report layout.

  4. 4

    Frame the cost of not knowing using only mechanisms present in the source files — describe the categories of loss the audit typically uncovers as categories, without attaching invented figures to them.

  5. 5

    Set the price low relative to the implementation work it points toward, and state plainly what happens after delivery: the buyer can act on the findings independently, or apply the audit fee toward implementation if that path exists in the source files.

  6. 6

    Define the buyer's input requirements as a short access checklist (accounts, files, permissions) and place it before the purchase action so no one buys and then stalls.

  7. 7

    Specify responsive behavior: on mobile render the methodology areas as an accordion with one open by default and the report preview as a swipeable card stack; on tablet display methodology in two columns with the preview fixed beneath it; on desktop use a split view with methodology on the left and a scrollable full-size report preview on the right.

  8. 8

    End with one action — book the audit — and immediately below it state the turnaround time in business days, sourced from real past delivery times.

Edge cases it handles

5

The things an agent skips when you only say "build a audit offer".
  • The source files show audits of varying depth — define one depth level for this offer and note the deeper version as a separate engagement rather than as an upsell tier on the same page.
  • Required access cannot be granted before purchase — sequence the access request as the first post-purchase step and say so on the page.
  • Findings may be zero or minimal for a healthy buyer — state in advance what the buyer receives when few issues are found, so the offer is not perceived as conditional on bad news.
  • The audit touches sensitive data — describe handling and deletion practices only as documented in the source files, and flag the gap if undocumented.
  • No prior audit exists to preview — build the preview from the checklist structure and label it as a template outline, not a past client document.

Definition of done

7

Your builder is required to check every one of these before reporting the work finished.
  • Every evaluation dimension on the page maps to a line item in the supplied checklist or rubric.
  • The deliverable's format, length, and delivery method are stated concretely.
  • A buyer-side access checklist appears above the primary purchase action.
  • Turnaround time is stated in business days and derived from real delivery history.
  • No loss figures, percentages, or outcome claims appear unless they exist verbatim in the source files.
  • Accordion, two-column, and split-view behaviors are implemented for mobile, tablet, and desktop respectively.
  • The builder reports which source files supplied the methodology and turnaround data, and names any assumption it could not resolve.

Related offer files

How it works

  1. 1

    Copy the link

    Grab the Markdown blueprint URL for this offer type.

  2. 2

    Give it to your builder

    Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or whatever AI builder is already working in your app.

  3. 3

    It maps, then builds

    Your agent reads the blueprint first, then builds the offer into your app around the product, audience, and stack.

Works with your stack

These blueprints are written to adapt. They tell the agent to detect your framework, match your existing design system, and use your source files instead of guessing the offer.

Need it tighter than that? Customize the offer file and tell it exactly which source docs and stack to use.